From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paeth v. Worth Twp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jun 21, 2012
Case Number 08-13926 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 21, 2012)

Opinion

Case Number 08-13926

06-21-2012

GEORGE T. PAETH and MARGARET C. PAETH, Plaintiffs, v. WORTH TOWNSHIP, Defendant.


Honorable David M. Lawson


ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR APPELLATE ATTORNEY'S FEES

AND COSTS AND DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS FOR THE PAYMENT OF FUNDS

The Court entered an amended judgment against the defendants on September 21, 2010. Shortly thereafter, the defendant moved for a new trial or remittitur. After the defendant's motion for new trial or remittitur was denied, the defendant filed a timely notice of appeal. On June 8, 2012, the court of appeals issued an opinion reversing the grant of summary judgment on the plaintiffs' due process violation; vacating the award of damages for that violation; and affirming the Court's judgment with regard to the plaintiffs' First Amendment violation, the award of damages for that violation, and the award of attorney's fees. The court of appeals has not issued a mandate yet. Presently, the matter is before the Court on the plaintiffs' motion for appellate attorney's fees and costs and disbursement of funds for the payment of funds.

The Court is without jurisdiction to entertain the plaintiffs' motion because the court of appeals has not issued a mandate. Youghiogheny & Ohio Coal Co. v. Milliken, 200 F.3d 942, 951-52 (6th Cir. 1999) ("Although the issuance of the mandate is largely a formality, the court of appeals retains jurisdiction over the case until it issues, and the district court or agency whose order is being reviewed cannot proceed in the interim."). Therefore, the Court must deny the plaintiffs' motion.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the plaintiffs' motion for appellate attorney's fees and costs and disbursement of funds for the payment of funds [dkt. #114] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

____________________________

DAVID M. LAWSON

United States District Judge

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on June 21, 2012.

Deborah R. Tofil

DEBORAH R. TOFIL


Summaries of

Paeth v. Worth Twp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jun 21, 2012
Case Number 08-13926 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 21, 2012)
Case details for

Paeth v. Worth Twp.

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE T. PAETH and MARGARET C. PAETH, Plaintiffs, v. WORTH TOWNSHIP…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 21, 2012

Citations

Case Number 08-13926 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 21, 2012)