From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paes v. Saul

UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Sep 16, 2020
CIVIL ACTION No. 20-cv-03418-RAL (E.D. Pa. Sep. 16, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION No. 20-cv-03418-RAL

09-16-2020

HEIDI LYNN PAES, Plaintiff v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Heidi Lynn Paes was denied social security benefits by the decision of an Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ"). Ms. Paes filed a complaint but had not yet filed a brief setting forth the specific grounds for her claim. Doc. No. 1 (Complaint). Prior to filing the Administrative Record, the Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner") conceded that further evaluation of Plaintiff's disability claim is warranted, and he requested that this case be remanded. Doc. No. 7 (Defendant's Uncontested Motion to Remand). The Commissioner has represented that Ms. Paes' counsel consented to his request. See id.

Because the parties agree that the ALJ erred in the evaluation of Ms. Paes' disability claim, Ms. Paes' request for review is granted, the final decision of the Commissioner is reversed, and this matter is remanded to the Commissioner further proceedings.

BY THE COURT:

s/Richard A . Lloret

RICHARD A. LLORET

U.S. Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Paes v. Saul

UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Sep 16, 2020
CIVIL ACTION No. 20-cv-03418-RAL (E.D. Pa. Sep. 16, 2020)
Case details for

Paes v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:HEIDI LYNN PAES, Plaintiff v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Sep 16, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION No. 20-cv-03418-RAL (E.D. Pa. Sep. 16, 2020)