From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paed v. Bank of America

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 4, 2011
No. C 11-03603 CRB (N.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 11-03603 CRB

10-04-2011

GENARO Q.PAED, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA, ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER RE-SETTING HEARING

DATE

Pro se Plaintiffs Genaro Paed and Corazon Paed ask the Court to extend the hearing date on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (dkt. 4) from Friday, October 7, 2011, to March 9, 2012, because Corazon Paed has left the United States for the Philippines to seek diabetes treatment and will not return until February 29, 2012. See dkt. 21. Defendants complain that Plaintiffs' entire lawsuit is intended to delay eviction and that an additional six month delay would prejudice them, and extend the time in which Plaintiffs live rent-free in the subject property. See Response (dkt. 23). The Court finds that Plaintiffs have not justified a six month delay, nor explained why Genaro Paed could not attend the hearing in Corazon Paed's absence. However, in order to give Plaintiffs ample opportunity to prepare for the hearing, the Court VACATES the current hearing date of October 7, 2011 and RE-SETS the hearing date for Friday, November 18, 2011.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Paed v. Bank of America

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 4, 2011
No. C 11-03603 CRB (N.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2011)
Case details for

Paed v. Bank of America

Case Details

Full title:GENARO Q.PAED, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA, ET AL., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 4, 2011

Citations

No. C 11-03603 CRB (N.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2011)