Opinion
No. 83-1303.
February 28, 1984. Rehearing Denied April 10, 1984.
Appeal conducted pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), from Circuit Court, Dade County; Thomas E. Scott, Judge.
Julio Padilla, in pro. per.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before HENDRY, NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
The order of revocation of probation under review, which, contrary to the trial court's oral findings that the defendant violated Conditions 2 and 4 only of the order granting probation, recites that the defendant violated Conditions 2, 4, 7 and 9, is upon remand to be modified by striking therefrom the reference to Conditions 7 and 9. In all other respects the order, and the pursuant judgment and sentence, are affirmed.
Remanded for modification of order and affirmed.