From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Padilla v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Jan 6, 2017
230 So. 3d 839 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 2D16–2070

01-06-2017

Ricardo PADILLA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).


BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

The petitioner's petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied. This case is remanded to the circuit court to enter corrected sentences that state the specific amount of jail credit to which the petitioner is entitled under section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (2016). See Crompton v. State, 728 So.2d 1188, 1189 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) (" Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1995), requires that defendants receive credit for all of the time spent in the county jail before sentence. The statute and case law do not qualify that this provision is not applicable to those serving life sentences without the possibility of parole.").

CRENSHAW, MORRIS, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Padilla v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Jan 6, 2017
230 So. 3d 839 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)
Case details for

Padilla v. State

Case Details

Full title:Ricardo PADILLA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Date published: Jan 6, 2017

Citations

230 So. 3d 839 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)