We therefore modify the judgment to reflect that Hernandez pled "Guilty" to the offense charged, he pled "True" to an enhancement allegation, and the jury found the enhancement allegation "True." See French v. State, 830 S.W.2d 607, 609 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992) (stating appellate court authorized to reform judgment to "make the record speak the truth"); Padilla v. State, No. 04-16-00389-CR, 2017 WL 2791323, at *2-3 (Tex. App.—San Antonio June 28, 2017, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (modifying judgment in Anders appeal to accurately reflect degree of offense and pleas and findings on enhancement allegations); Wiedenfeld v. State, 450 S.W.3d 905, 908 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2014, no pet.) (modifying judgment in Anders appeal to accurately reflect proceedings in trial court). We grant the motion to withdraw filed by Hernandez's counsel and affirm the trial court's judgment as modified.