Padilla v. Sauceda (In re Padilla)

Full title: IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF JOSE REYMUNDO PADILLA, v. JOSEPH SAUCEDA…

Court: Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Date published: May 6, 2024

No. A-1-CA-41645 (N.M. Ct. App. May. 6, 2024)

Opinion

A-1-CA-41645

05-06-2024

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF JOSE REYMUNDO PADILLA, v. JOSEPH SAUCEDA, Defendant-Appellant, and BRIDGET PADILLA, Personal Representative of the Estate, Plaintiff-Appellee, and JOE Y. ARREDONDO, NELLIE ARREDONDO, JOSE ARREDONDO JR., and DENAE HURST, Defendants.

Bridget Padilla Albuquerque, NM Pro Se Appellee Joseph Sauceda Albuquerque, NM Pro Se Appellant

MEGAN P. DUFFY, JUDGE

Corrections to this opinion/decision not affecting the outcome, at the Court's discretion, can occur up to the time of publication with NM Compilation Commission. The Court will ensure that the electronic version of this opinion/decision is updated accordingly in Odyssey.

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY Elaine P. Lujan, District Court Judge

Bridget Padilla Albuquerque, NM Pro Se Appellee

Joseph Sauceda Albuquerque, NM Pro Se Appellant

MEMORANDUM OPINION

MEGAN P. DUFFY, JUDGE

{¶1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing the proposed disposition has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED.

{¶2} IT IS SO ORDERED.

WE CONCUR: ZACHARY A. IVES, Judge, KATHERINE A. WRAY, Judge