Opinion
3:08-cv-00410-LRH-WGC
11-29-2012
RAYMOND PADILLA, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF NEVADA, et al., Defendants.
ORDER
Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb (#99) entered on September 18, 2012, recommending granting Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (#59), filed on June 4, 2012, and denying Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (#71) filed on June 4, 2012. No objection to the Report and Recommendation has been filed. The action was referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)B and Local Rule 1B 1-4 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.
Refers to court's docket number.
The Court has conducted its de novo review in this case, has fully considered the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) (1) (B) and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#99) entered on September 18, 2012, should be adopted and accepted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#99) entered on September 18, 2012, is adopted and accepted, and Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (#59) is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (#71) is DENIED as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
_______________
LARRY R. HICKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE