Opinion
Civil Action 3:21-CV-0908-C-BH
06-29-2021
ISMAEL H. PADILLA, Plaintiff, v. DIR. TX., PRISON SYSTEM, et al, Defendants.
ORDER
SAM R. CUMMINGS, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Before the Court are the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge therein advising the Court that Plaintiffs Motion lo Appeal; Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation, and Provide Info that, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) does Not Exists [sic] in Pro Se Litigation should be construed as a motion to alter or amend the judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) and should be denied.
Plaintiff has failed to file objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation and the time to do so has now expired.
The Court has reviewed the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for clear error and finds none. It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court. For the reasons stated therein, the Court ORDERS that Plaintiffs Motion-construed as a motion to alter or amend the judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e)-is hereby DENIED.
SO ORDERED.