From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Padilla v. Austin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Nov 1, 2012
10-CV-4891 (DLI) (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 1, 2012)

Opinion

10-CV-4891 (DLI)

11-01-2012

CARMEN PADILLA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CORA D. AUSTIN, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM

AND ORDER

ROANNE L. MANN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE:

The Court has reviewed plaintiff's counsel's time records, and has found them to overstate counsel's hours in several respects. Nevertheless, the substantially reduced fee amount that plaintiff's counsel has agreed to accept, and that plaintiff Carmen Padilla has approved in open court, is reasonable, even taking into account the problems with plaintiff's counsel's time records.

For example, the time is tracked in quarter-hour increments, rather than the preferred one-tenth hour increments; the time includes clerical work (such as electronically filing the Second Amended Complaint), which is not properly billable as attorney time; and some tasks appear to have taken an excessive amount of time to perform (for example, one hour to draft and file a half-page letter to the Court on 9/8/11, and two hours to reserve a room for the mediation).

SO ORDERED. Dated: Brooklyn, New York

November 1, 2012

_______________

ROANNE L. MANN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Padilla v. Austin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Nov 1, 2012
10-CV-4891 (DLI) (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 1, 2012)
Case details for

Padilla v. Austin

Case Details

Full title:CARMEN PADILLA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CORA D. AUSTIN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Nov 1, 2012

Citations

10-CV-4891 (DLI) (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 1, 2012)