From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paddy v. Beard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 21, 2012
CIVIL ACTION No. 03-5312 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 21, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION No. 03-5312

11-21-2012

DONYELL PADDY v. JEFFREY BEARD, LOUIS S. FOLINO, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA


ORDER

AND NOW, this 20th day of November, 2012, upon consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus (paper no. 1), the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Thomas J. Rueter, Chief United States Magistrate Judge (paper no. 39), petitioner's objections to the Report and Recommendation (paper no. 50), and all other relevant papers in the record, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner's objections are OVERRULED.
2. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED.
4. Because the petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, there is no basis for issuing a certificate of appealability.

Norma L. Shapiro

J.


Summaries of

Paddy v. Beard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 21, 2012
CIVIL ACTION No. 03-5312 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 21, 2012)
Case details for

Paddy v. Beard

Case Details

Full title:DONYELL PADDY v. JEFFREY BEARD, LOUIS S. FOLINO, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Nov 21, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION No. 03-5312 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 21, 2012)