Opinion
Argued October 24, 1922
Decided November 21, 1922
Thomas Burns for appellant.
Samuel Child for respondent.
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., HOGAN, CARDOZO, POUND, McLAUGHLIN, CRANE and ANDREWS, JJ.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Paddock v. Paddock
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 21, 1922
138 N.E. 459 (N.Y. 1922)
Summaries of
Paddock v. Paddock
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 21, 1922
138 N.E. 459 (N.Y. 1922)
Case details for
Paddock v. Paddock
Case Details
Full title:LOVELAND PADDOCK, Plaintiff, v . FRANK S. PADDOCK, Appellant, and OLIVE A…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Nov 21, 1922
Citations
138 N.E. 459 (N.Y. 1922)
138 N.E. 459
Citing Cases
Paddock v. Paddock
Motion for re-argument denied with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. (See 234 N.Y.…