Paddock v. Dreamworks Animation SKG, Inc.

Full title: Charles Paddock v. Dreamworks Animation SKG, Inc., et al

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: May 19, 2015

CV 14-06053 SJO (Ex) (C.D. Cal. May. 19, 2015)

Opinion

Charles Paddock v. Dreamworks Animation SKG, Inc., et al No. CV 14-06053 SJO (Ex) United States District Court, C.D. California May 19, 2015

          PROCEEDINGS (in chambers): FINAL JUDGMENT ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

          HONORABLE S. JAMES OTERO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

         This matter came before the Court on Defendants DreamWorks Animation SKG, Inc., Lewis Coleman, and Jeffrey Katzenberg (collectively, " Defendants") Motion to Dismiss (" Motion"), filed December 22, 2014. The Court issued an Order granting dismissal of all claims, and Plaintiff Roofers Local No. 149 Pension Fund's (" Plaintiff") elected not to amend its claims. In view of the Court's order of dismissal, and good cause having been shown, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that judgment is entered in favor of Defendants. This case is hereby dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff shall take nothing by its Complaint.

         IT IS SO ADJUDGED.