Paddison Scenic Props., Family Trust, L.C. v. Idaho Cnty.

2 Citing cases

  1. ABC Agra, LLC v. Critical Access Group, Inc.

    156 Idaho 781 (Idaho 2014)   Cited 8 times
    Outlining the Idaho caselaw favoring the Lujan standing doctrine

    "The traditional ripeness doctrine requires a petitioner or plaintiff to prove 1) that the case presents definite and concrete issues, 2) that a real and substantial controversy exists, and 3) that there is a present need for adjudication." Paddison Scenic Props., Family Trust, L.C. v. Idaho Cnty., 153 Idaho 1, 4, 278 P.3d 403, 406 (2012) (quoting Noh v. Cenarrusa, 137 Idaho 798, 801, 53 P.3d 1217, 1220 (2002) ). Idaho Code section 10–1202 provides that "[a]ny person ... whose rights, status or other legal relations are affected by a statute, municipal ordinance, contract or franchise, may have determined any question of construction or validity arising under the instrument, statute, ordinance, contract or franchise and obtain a declaration of rights, status or other legal relations thereunder."

  2. Rowley v. Ada Cnty. Highway Dist.

    156 Idaho 275 (Idaho 2014)   Cited 6 times

    Statutory dedication is based on the statutes in effect when the owner dedicated the land. Paddison Scenic Props., Family Trust, L.C., v. Idaho Cnty., 153 Idaho 1, 3, 278 P.3d 403, 405 (2012). In 1950 and 1954, two Idaho statutes were relevant.