From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paclik v. Metro. Life Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 6, 2013
No. C 12-5839 PJH (N.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2013)

Opinion

No. C 12-5839 PJH

03-06-2013

CHARLES THOMAS PACLIK, Plaintiff(s), v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendant(s).


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The parties hereto, by their counsel, having advised the court that they have agreed to a conditional settlement of this cause, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this cause of action is dismissed without prejudice; provided, however that if any party hereto shall certify to this court, within sixty days, with proof of service thereof, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing order shall stand vacated and this cause shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial.

If no certification is filed, after passage of sixty days, the dismissal shall be with prejudice. The parties may substitute a dismissal with prejudice at any time during this sixty-day period.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Paclik v. Metro. Life Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 6, 2013
No. C 12-5839 PJH (N.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2013)
Case details for

Paclik v. Metro. Life Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES THOMAS PACLIK, Plaintiff(s), v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 6, 2013

Citations

No. C 12-5839 PJH (N.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2013)