From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Packing Co. v. Williams

Supreme Court of North Carolina
May 1, 1898
30 S.E. 340 (N.C. 1898)

Opinion

(Decided 24 May, 1898.)

Dismissal of Action — Extension of Time to File Complaint — Discretion of Court — Appeal.

The refusal to allow an extension of time to file a complaint is within the discretion of the trial judge, and his order dismissing the action for failure to file complaint within the time prescribed by law will not be disturbed on appeal.

ACTION, heard before Adams, J., at January Term, 1898, of NEW HANOVER on defendant's motion to dismiss the action for plaintiff's failure to file its complaint within the time prescribed by law. The summons was issued 16 June, 1896, and the complaint was filed 16 September, 1897. His Honor, in the exercise of his discretion, allowed the motion, and plaintiff appealed.

Herbert McClammy for plaintiff.

T. W. Strange and Ricaud Bryan for defendants.


The refusal to extend the time to file the complaint rested in the discretion of the judge. In dismissing the action there is

No error.

(409)


Summaries of

Packing Co. v. Williams

Supreme Court of North Carolina
May 1, 1898
30 S.E. 340 (N.C. 1898)
Case details for

Packing Co. v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:ARMOUR PACKING COMPANY v. G. W. WILLIAMS ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: May 1, 1898

Citations

30 S.E. 340 (N.C. 1898)
122 N.C. 408