Opinion
Argued January 19, 1905
Decided February 3, 1905
Frank Hopkins for appellant.
Samuel Packard for respondents.
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, VANN and WERNER, JJ.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Packard v. Windholz
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 3, 1905
73 N.E. 1121 (N.Y. 1905)
Summaries of
Packard v. Windholz
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 3, 1905
73 N.E. 1121 (N.Y. 1905)
Case details for
Packard v. Windholz
Case Details
Full title:NATHAN PACKARD et al., Respondents, v . LOUIS WINDHOLZ, Appellant
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Feb 3, 1905
Citations
73 N.E. 1121 (N.Y. 1905)
180 N.Y. 549
Citing Cases
Newark Finance Corp. v. Acocella
Moler v. State Bank, 176 Minn. 449; 223 N.W. Rep. 780; 62 A.L.R. 799 (section 66, U.L.A. ( N.I.A.), 468),…