From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Packaging Supplies, Inc. v. Harley-Davidson, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Dec 2, 2011
Civil Action No. 08-C-400 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 2, 2011)

Summary

referencing the "'high burden of showing that Rule 11 sanctions are warranted'"

Summary of this case from Holland v. City of Gary

Opinion

Civil Action No. 08-C-400

12-02-2011

PACKAGING SUPPLIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. HARLEY-DAVIDSON, INC.; and HARLEY- DAVIDSON MOTOR COMPANY, INC., Defendants HARLEY-DAVIDSON, INC.; HARLEY- DAVIDSON MOTOR COMPANY, INC.; and H-D MICHIGAN, LLC, Counterclaim Plaintiffs, v. PACKAGING SUPPLIES, INC., Counterclaim Defendant.

By: Thomas M. Williams WINSTON & STRAWN LLP BAKER BOTTS LLP 1299 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Washington, DC 20004 James G. Kress Barbara O. Bruckmann Charles M. Malaise Counsel for Hurley-Davidson, Inc., Hurley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc., andH-D Michigan, LLC By: Alan F. Block BLOCK & LANDSMAN Counsel for Packaging Supplies, Inc.


Hon. , Jr.

STIPULATED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the Court's Minute Entry (Dckt. #98), dated November 22, 2011, the Parties respectfully submit this Stipulated Motion for Entry of a Consent Judgment. In support of this Stipulated Motion, the Parties state:

1. The proposed Consent Judgment, attached hereto, was the subject of arms-length negotiation and agreement of the Parties and their counsel of record as an integral part of a comprehensive, confidential Settlement Agreement.
2. The terms of the proposed Consent Judgment are consistent with the issues adjudicated and found by this Court in its Memorandum Opinion and Order, dated May 12, 2011, and with the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65.
3. The Parties' Settlement Agreement and proposed Consent Judgment fully and finally resolves all issues in this litigation. Entry of the proposed Consent Judgment should permit the Court to enter a final judgment in this matter.

Wherefore, the parties respectfully request the Court to enter the proposed Consent Judgment attached hereto as Exhibit 1.

By: Thomas M. Williams

WINSTON & STRAWN LLP

BAKER BOTTS LLP

1299 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.

Washington, DC 20004

James G. Kress

Barbara O. Bruckmann

Charles M. Malaise

Counsel for Hurley-Davidson, Inc., Hurley-Davidson

Motor Company, Inc., andH-D Michigan, LLC

By: Alan F. Block

BLOCK & LANDSMAN

Counsel for Packaging Supplies, Inc.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned counsel hereby certifies that on December 2, 2011, a true and correct copy of STIPULATED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT was filed with the Court's CM/ECF system, which will send electronic notice to all attorneys of record.

Thomas M. Williams

CHI:2601047.1


Summaries of

Packaging Supplies, Inc. v. Harley-Davidson, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Dec 2, 2011
Civil Action No. 08-C-400 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 2, 2011)

referencing the "'high burden of showing that Rule 11 sanctions are warranted'"

Summary of this case from Holland v. City of Gary

referencing the "'high burden of showing that Rule 11 sanctions are warranted'"

Summary of this case from Apex Colors, Inc. v. Chemworld Int'l Ltd.

referencing the "'high burden of showing that Rule 11 sanctions are warranted'"

Summary of this case from Apex Colors, Inc. v. Chemworld Int'l Ltd.
Case details for

Packaging Supplies, Inc. v. Harley-Davidson, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PACKAGING SUPPLIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. HARLEY-DAVIDSON, INC.; and HARLEY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 2, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 08-C-400 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 2, 2011)

Citing Cases

Holland v. City of Gary

Next, Plaintiff makes several unsupported assertions about false statements and documents in the record and…

Apex Colors, Inc. v. Chemworld Int'l Ltd.

Senese v. Chi. Area I.B. of T. Pension Fund, 237 F.3d 819, 823-24 (7th Cir. 2001) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P.…