Pacific Phonograph Co. v. Searchlight Horn Co.

Full title: PACIFIC PHONOGRAPH CO. v. SEARCHLIGHT HORN CO.

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Aug 9, 1915

225 F. 500 (9th Cir. 1915)

Opinion

225 F. 500 (9th Cir. 1915) PACIFIC PHONOGRAPH CO. v. SEARCHLIGHT HORN CO. No. 2518. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. August 9, 1915

N. A. Acker and D. Hadsell, both of San Francisco, Cal., and J. Edgar Bull, of New York City, for appellant.

John H. Miller, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before GILBERT and ROSS, Circuit Judges, and WOLVERTON, District judge.

WOLVERTON, District Judge.

This case is akin to that of Sherman, Clay & Co. v. Searchlight Horn Co., 225 F. 497, . . . C.C.A. . . ., just decided. The appellant purchased from Thomas A. Edison, Incorporated. The latter company has also been sued by appellee in New Jersey. Neither company is a manufacturer of the infringing devices. The appellant petitioned for an injunction, the same as the defendant in the Sherman, Clay & Co. Case, making like allegations as to the seller being annoyed, harassed, etc., and the district court denied the injunction. The causes being of the same nature, the decision in the Sherman, Clay & Co. Case is decisive of this.

Affirmed.