From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pacific Marine Ins. Co. v. Clark

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 5, 1991
942 F.2d 793 (9th Cir. 1991)

Opinion


942 F.2d 793 (9th Cir. 1991) PACIFIC MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Walter E. CLARK, et al., Defendants, and Christopher Fulton, Defendant-intervenor-Appellant. No. 89-35172. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit September 5, 1991

Editorial Note:

This opinion appears in the Federal reporter in a table titled "Table of Decisions Without Reported Opinions". (See FI CTA9 Rule 36-3 regarding use of unpublished opinions)

Argued and Submitted Aug. 22, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska, No. CV-86-529-JMF; James M. Fitzgerald, Chief District Judge, Presiding.

D.Alaska

VACATED AND REMANDED.

Before TANG, REINHARDT and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3.

Because appellee Pacific Marine Insurance Company has approved the claim of appellant Fulton, this appeal is moot. Accordingly, we vacate the judgment of the district court and remand with a direction to dismiss. See United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 39 (1950).

VACATED and REMANDED.


Summaries of

Pacific Marine Ins. Co. v. Clark

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 5, 1991
942 F.2d 793 (9th Cir. 1991)
Case details for

Pacific Marine Ins. Co. v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:PACIFIC MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Walter E. CLARK…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Sep 5, 1991

Citations

942 F.2d 793 (9th Cir. 1991)

Citing Cases

Le Van Son v. Inch

Even without an allegation of actual harm, at this stage, Plaintiff's assertions are enough to allow his…

Hartman v. Santa Clara Cnty.

Before the Court is Plaintiff Katie Lightfoot's motion for equitable relief. While Title VII authorizes…