From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pachter v. Pachter

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Nov 11, 1927
130 Misc. 769 (N.Y. App. Term 1927)

Opinion

November 11, 1927.

Appeal from the Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Second District.

O'Brien O'Brien [ Edward J. O'Brien of counsel], for the appellant.

Morris Samuel Meyers, for the respondent.

Present, DELEHANTY, LYDON and CRAIN, JJ.



The plaintiff's right to the sum sued for arises from the order made in her behalf in her action against the defendant for a judicial separation, which order awarded her temporary alimony. It was an order enforcible only in the action in which it was made and it was merged in the final judgment in that action. This action was not commenced until some six months after the entry of such final judgment.

Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and complaint dismissed on the merits, with costs.

All concur.


Summaries of

Pachter v. Pachter

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Nov 11, 1927
130 Misc. 769 (N.Y. App. Term 1927)
Case details for

Pachter v. Pachter

Case Details

Full title:ROSE PACHTER, Respondent, v. HARRY PACHTER, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Nov 11, 1927

Citations

130 Misc. 769 (N.Y. App. Term 1927)
225 N.Y.S. 56

Citing Cases

Mittman v. Mittman

( Hayes v. Hayes, 150 App. Div. 842; affd., 208 N.Y. 600 [in effect overruling Shepard v. Shepard, 99 App.…

Holmes v. Holmes

" The rule laid down in the foregoing cases is also stated or upheld in Walter vs. Walter, 15 App. D.C. 333,…