From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pacheco v. Bosworth

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 25, 2002
41 F. App'x 974 (9th Cir. 2002)

Opinion


41 Fed.Appx. 974 (9th Cir. 2002) Robert PACHECO, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Dain BOSWORTH, Defendant, and Terry EDGINGTON, Defendant--Appellant. Robert PACHECO, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Terry EDGINGTON, Defendant, and Bonnie BRAND, Defendant--Appellant. Nos. 00-16937, 00-17071. D.C. No. CV-98-00715-RLH. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. July 25, 2002

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Before HUG, D.W. NELSON and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

Page 975.

ORDER

The mandate in case No. 00-16937 is recalled.

The panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing in case No. 00-17071. Judges Hug and Nelson have recommended denial of the petition for rehearing en banc and Judge Hawkins has voted to deny the en banc petition.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no active judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.

The petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are denied.

The Memorandum disposition filed on March 1, 2002 is withdrawn.


Summaries of

Pacheco v. Bosworth

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 25, 2002
41 F. App'x 974 (9th Cir. 2002)
Case details for

Pacheco v. Bosworth

Case Details

Full title:Robert PACHECO, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Dain BOSWORTH, Defendant, and…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jul 25, 2002

Citations

41 F. App'x 974 (9th Cir. 2002)