From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pacheco v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
May 3, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-CV-1815 (E.D. Pa. May. 3, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-CV-1815.

May 3, 2011


ORDER


AND NOW, 2nd day of May, 2011, upon independent review of Plaintiff's Brief and Statement of Issues in Support of Request for Review (Doc. No. 10), Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Request for Review (Doc. No. 17), Plaintiff's reply (Doc. No. 20), and the administrative record, and after careful consideration of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David R. Strawbridge, and the lack of any objection to the Report and Recommendation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.

2. The final decision of the Commissioner denying disability benefits to Plaintiff is VACATED; and

3. This matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with the Report.


Summaries of

Pacheco v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
May 3, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-CV-1815 (E.D. Pa. May. 3, 2011)
Case details for

Pacheco v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:VICTORIA PACHECO, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL ASTRUE, Commissioner of the Social…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: May 3, 2011

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-CV-1815 (E.D. Pa. May. 3, 2011)