From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pacheco-Figueroa v. Birkholz

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 19, 2024
2:24-cv-06523-JLS-JDE (C.D. Cal. Dec. 19, 2024)

Opinion

2:24-cv-06523-JLS-JDE

12-19-2024

JAMIE EDGARDO PACHECO-FIGUEROA, Petitioner, v. BRYAN BIRKHOLZ, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

JOSEPHINE L.STATON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the records on file, including the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Person in Federal Custody Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Dkt. 1 “Petition”) filed by Jamie Edgardo Pacheco-Figueroa (“Petitioner”), the Motion to Dismiss the Petition (Dkt. 11, “Motion”) filed by Respondent, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 18, “Report”). No party filed a timely objection to the Report or timely sought additional time in which to do so. The Court accordingly accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

(1) The Motion (Dkt. 11) is GRANTED on mootness grounds; and

(2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action without prejudice.


Summaries of

Pacheco-Figueroa v. Birkholz

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 19, 2024
2:24-cv-06523-JLS-JDE (C.D. Cal. Dec. 19, 2024)
Case details for

Pacheco-Figueroa v. Birkholz

Case Details

Full title:JAMIE EDGARDO PACHECO-FIGUEROA, Petitioner, v. BRYAN BIRKHOLZ, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Dec 19, 2024

Citations

2:24-cv-06523-JLS-JDE (C.D. Cal. Dec. 19, 2024)