From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pace v. Woodmen Hills Metropolitan District

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Aug 30, 2011
Civil Action No. 10-cv-01081-RPM (D. Colo. Aug. 30, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 10-cv-01081-RPM.

August 30, 2011


ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL


Pursuant to the hearing held today, it is

ORDERED that the motion to withdraw filed by Marc H. Schtul and Richard W. Daily on August 24, 2011, is granted and they have no further responsibility for the representation of the plaintiff before this court in this civil action and it it

FURTHER ORDERED that the entry of appearance as counsel for the plaintiff by T. Edward Williams is granted, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the defendants' motion to compel is granted. The plaintiff's responses will be due on September 15, 2011, and the defendants' request for fees and expenses in submitting the motion to compel will be resolved by agreement between Mr. Daily and Mr. O'Connell.


Summaries of

Pace v. Woodmen Hills Metropolitan District

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Aug 30, 2011
Civil Action No. 10-cv-01081-RPM (D. Colo. Aug. 30, 2011)
Case details for

Pace v. Woodmen Hills Metropolitan District

Case Details

Full title:RONALD R. PACE, Plaintiff, v. WOODMEN HILLS METROPOLITAN DISTRICT, LARRY…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Aug 30, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 10-cv-01081-RPM (D. Colo. Aug. 30, 2011)