From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pace v. Woodmen Hills Metro. Dist.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Sep 28, 2012
Civil Action No. 10-cv-01081-RPM (D. Colo. Sep. 28, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 10-cv-01081-RPM

09-28-2012

RONALD R. PACE, Plaintiff, v. WOODMEN HILLS METROPOLITAN DISTRICT, a political subdivision of the State of Colorado, LARRY BISHOP, and JANICE L. PIZZI Defendants.


Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Courtroom Deputy: J. Chris Smith

FTR Technician: Kathy Terasaki

Trocon E. Williams


William T. O'Connell, III


COURTROOM MINUTES

Hearing on Motions for Summary Judgment

10:00 a.m. Court in session.

Court's preliminary remarks and states its understanding of the case facts and claims. 10:12 a.m. Argument by Mr. O'Connell.
10:30 a.m. Argument by Mr. Williams.
10:56 a.m. Rebuttal argument by Mr. O'Connell.

ORDERED: Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [75] is taken under advisement.

Defendants' Second Motion for Summary Judgment [100], is taken under advisement.

11:10 a.m. Court in recess.

Hearing concluded. Total time: 1 hr. 10 min.


Summaries of

Pace v. Woodmen Hills Metro. Dist.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Sep 28, 2012
Civil Action No. 10-cv-01081-RPM (D. Colo. Sep. 28, 2012)
Case details for

Pace v. Woodmen Hills Metro. Dist.

Case Details

Full title:RONALD R. PACE, Plaintiff, v. WOODMEN HILLS METROPOLITAN DISTRICT, a…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Sep 28, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 10-cv-01081-RPM (D. Colo. Sep. 28, 2012)