From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pace v. Woodmen Hills Metro. Dist.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Dec 30, 2011
Civil Action No. 10-cv-01081-RPM (D. Colo. Dec. 30, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 10-cv-01081-RPM

12-30-2011

RONALD R. PACE, Plaintiff, v. WOODMEN HILLS METROPOLITAN DISTRICT, LARRY R. BISHOP, and JANICE L. PIZZI, Defendants.


Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch


ORDER TO STAY BRIEFING ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT

On December 21, 2011, the defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. Because the multiple motions addressing discovery disputes should be heard before further briefing on that motion, it is

ORDERED that briefing on the motion for summary judgment is stayed until further order of Court and the hearing will be set on the discovery motions at a time to be set.

BY THE COURT:

_____________________

Richard P. Matsch, Senior Judge


Summaries of

Pace v. Woodmen Hills Metro. Dist.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Dec 30, 2011
Civil Action No. 10-cv-01081-RPM (D. Colo. Dec. 30, 2011)
Case details for

Pace v. Woodmen Hills Metro. Dist.

Case Details

Full title:RONALD R. PACE, Plaintiff, v. WOODMEN HILLS METROPOLITAN DISTRICT, LARRY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Dec 30, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 10-cv-01081-RPM (D. Colo. Dec. 30, 2011)