Opinion
Civil Action No. 10-cv-01081-RPM
05-09-2012
RONALD R. PACE, Plaintiff, v. WOODMEN HILLS METROPOLITAN DISTRICT, a political subdivision of the State of Colorado, LARRY BISHOP, and JANICE L. PIZZI Defendants.
Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch
Courtroom Deputy: J. Chris Smith
FTR Technician: Kathy Terasaki
Trocom E. Williams
William T. O'Connell, III
COURTROOM MINUTES
Hearing on Pending Motions
10:59 a.m. Court in session.
Court's preliminary remarks.
ORDERED: Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Defendant's Reply Brief [91], is denied.
Court states its concerns with the case claims as pleaded and its summary of the case facts. Argument by Mr. O'Connell.
Court states it considers Plaintiff's First Claim of Malicious Prosecution and Second Claim of Fabrication of Evidence as pleaded as in the Second Amended Complaint [40] as one claim for relief.
Argument by Mr. Williams.
Rebuttal argument by Mr. O'Connell.
Defendants' objection to the filing of a third amended complaint by Mr. O'Connell.
ORDERED: Plaintiff shall clarify his claims by the filing of a third amended complaint by May 21, 2012.
Defendants shall respond by motion for summary judgment by June 20, 2012.
ORDERED: Ruling on Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [75] is deferred pending review of plaintiff's third amended complaint.
11:55 a.m. Court in recess. Hearing concluded. Total time: 56 min.