From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pace v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jan 5, 1999
235 Ga. App. 872 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion


510 S.E.2d 617 (Ga.App. 1999) 235 Ga.App. 872 PACE v. The STATE. No. A98A2096. Court of Appeals of Georgia. January 5, 1999

        Gayle D. Bacon, Decatur, for appellant.

       J. Tom Morgan, District Attorney, Barbara B. Conroy, Robert W. Houman, Noah H. Pines, Assistant District Attorneys, for appellee.

       McMURRAY, Presiding Judge.

       Defendant Pace appeals his conviction of theft by taking. The sole enumeration of error questions the sufficiency of the evidence to authorize the conviction. Held:

       On August 7, 1996, defendant aroused the suspicions of two salespersons working in the fine jewelry department of a department store. One of the salespersons contacted security, and defendant was observed and videotaped by a security officer.

       Two days later, defendant returned to the department store, where his presence aroused the concern of the same two salespersons who again notified security. Even as one of the salespersons was talking to security on the telephone, the two salespersons observed defendant pick up an entire jewelry display carousel and leave the store with it. A department store sales manager testified that the jewelry carousel contained approximately 100 pieces of jewelry, 14-carat gold necklaces and earrings, with a total value of around $10,000.

       While defendant attacks the credibility of the identification witnesses, determination of a witness credibility, including the accuracy of identification testimony, is within the exclusive province of the jury. Moore v. State, 268 Ga. 420, 421(1), 489 S.E.2d 842; Norris v. State, 258 Ga. 889, 890(1), 376 S.E.2d 653; Price v. State, 223 Ga.App. 807, 810(4), 478 S.E.2d 915; Hopkins v. State, 222 Ga.App. 157, 473 S.E.2d 267. Also, there was sufficient evidence of value to support the felony sentencing of defendant. Moncus v. State, 229 Ga.App. 803, 804(1)(a), 495 S.E.2d 118. The evidence was sufficient to authorize a rational trier to find defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the offense of theft by taking and to authorize the felony sentencing. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560; Moncus v. State, 229 Ga.App. 803, 804-805(1), 495 S.E.2d 118, supra.

       Judgment affirmed.

       BLACKBURN and ELDRIDGE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pace v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jan 5, 1999
235 Ga. App. 872 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Pace v. State

Case Details

Full title:PACE v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jan 5, 1999

Citations

235 Ga. App. 872 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999)
235 Ga. App. 872
510 S.E.2d 607

Citing Cases

Wilson v. State

However, the failure to see the "alleged" tattoo would not necessarily impeach the testimony of the…

Wilkerson v. State

Johnson, C. J., and Smith, P.J., concur. Pace v. State, 235 Ga. App. 872, 873 ( 510 S.E.2d 607) (1999).…