From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pace v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 23, 2002
806 So. 2d 571 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

Case No. 4D01-3459

Opinion filed January 23, 2002

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Dan L. Vaughn, Judge; L.T. Case No. 98-2286CF.

Mitchell J. Pace, Daytona Beach, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.


Affirmed without prejudice to refile a legally sufficient motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. See Baker v. State, 714 So.2d 1167, 1167 n. 1 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) (explaining that "[t]he allegations required by State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429 (Fla. 1998) at a minimum would have to address how and where the record demonstrates entitlement to relief.").

GUNTHER, STEVENSON and MAY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pace v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 23, 2002
806 So. 2d 571 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Pace v. State

Case Details

Full title:MITCHELL J. PACE, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jan 23, 2002

Citations

806 So. 2d 571 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)