From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pace v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Aug 19, 2010
Civ. No. 09-6226-CL (D. Or. Aug. 19, 2010)

Opinion

Civ. No. 09-6226-CL.

August 19, 2010


ORDER


Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). Although no objections have been filed, this court reviews the legal principles de novo. See Lorin Corp. v Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F. 2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1983).

I have given this matter de novo review. I find no error in the Report and Recommendation.

CONCLUSION

Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (#14) is adopted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pace v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Aug 19, 2010
Civ. No. 09-6226-CL (D. Or. Aug. 19, 2010)
Case details for

Pace v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:KELLY D. PACE Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Aug 19, 2010

Citations

Civ. No. 09-6226-CL (D. Or. Aug. 19, 2010)