From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pace Pontiac, Inc. v. Milby

Supreme Court of Florida
May 10, 1966
185 So. 2d 467 (Fla. 1966)

Opinion

No. 34543.

April 6, 1966. Rehearing Denied May 10, 1966.

Writ of Certiorari to District Court of Appeal, Second District.

For opinion of District Court of Appeal see 176 So.2d 554

John Matthews, of Macfarlane, Ferguson, Allison Kelly, Tampa, for petitioner.

Tom J. Johnson, Jr., Tampa, for respondents.


The Petition for Writ of Certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the Writ and have heard argument of the parties. After argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the jurisdictional conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A., does not appear. Therefore, the Writ must be and is hereby discharged and the Petition for Writ of Certiorari is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C.J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, O'CONNELL, CALDWELL, ERVIN and BARNS (Retired), JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pace Pontiac, Inc. v. Milby

Supreme Court of Florida
May 10, 1966
185 So. 2d 467 (Fla. 1966)
Case details for

Pace Pontiac, Inc. v. Milby

Case Details

Full title:PACE PONTIAC, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, PETITIONER, v. LYDIA MILBY AND…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: May 10, 1966

Citations

185 So. 2d 467 (Fla. 1966)

Citing Cases

Wagner v. City of Hialeah

he jury. See Lubbell v. Roman Spa, Inc., 362 So.2d 922 (Fla. 1978) (trial court correctly denied directed…

Maas Bros., Inc. v. Bishop

" 74 So.2d at 278-279; accord, Pensacola Greyhound Racing, Inc. v. Williams, Fla. App. 1967, 193 So.2d 628,…