From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pac-Tec, Inc. v. Amerace

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Jan 14, 1991
922 F.2d 1577 (Fed. Cir. 1991)

Opinion

Nos. 89-1329, 89-1692.

January 14, 1991.

Owen E. Perry, of Reising, Ethington, Barnard, Perry Milton, Troy, Mich., argued, for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief, were Jeanne-Marie Buiteweg and Richard W. Hoffmann. Thomas E. Anderson, Gifford, Groh, Sprinkle, Patmore Anderson, P.C., Birmingham, Mich., for plaintiff-appellant.

Ronald A. Sandler, of Jones, Day, Reavis Pogue, Chicago, Ill., argued, for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief, was Sandra B. Weiss. Of counsel were Charles Rutherford, Robert L. Kelly and Dykema Gossett, Detroit, Mich.

Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan; Robert E. DeMascio, Judge.

Before MARKEY and PLAGER, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT, Senior Circuit Judge.


ORDER


Having considered the application of Amerace Corporation (Amerace) for the attorney fees and double costs awarded in the opinion of May 9, 1990, and the oppositions thereto filed by Pac-Tec, Inc. (Pac-Tec) and Owen E. Perry (Perry), IT IS ORDERED that

Amerace is entitled to recover, within 30 days of the date of this ORDER, the sum of $134,000.18 from Pac-Tec and Perry who shall be jointly and severally liable.


Summaries of

Pac-Tec, Inc. v. Amerace

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Jan 14, 1991
922 F.2d 1577 (Fed. Cir. 1991)
Case details for

Pac-Tec, Inc. v. Amerace

Case Details

Full title:PAC-TEC, INC., APPELLANT, v. AMERACE CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Jan 14, 1991

Citations

922 F.2d 1577 (Fed. Cir. 1991)