From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pac. Premier Tr. v. Walton

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 30, 2023
3:23-cv-00089-WHO (N.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2023)

Opinion

3:23-cv-00089-WHO

01-30-2023

PACIFIC PREMIER TRUST, FBO CAROL PATTERSON, CURTIS ROTH IRA ACT 080000001188, Plaintiff, v. ROY WALTON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND ISMISSING CASE

RE: DKT. NO. 6

William H. Orrick United States District Judge

Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim issued a Report and Recommendation that I remand this pro se case to state court due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction. [Dkt. No. 6]. No party has objected. See Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 72(b).

I have reviewed the entirety of the record and docket. I agree that I lack subject matter jurisdiction and so I ADOPT the Report and Recommendation. This case is hereby REMANDED to the California Superior Court for Contra Costa County.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pac. Premier Tr. v. Walton

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 30, 2023
3:23-cv-00089-WHO (N.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2023)
Case details for

Pac. Premier Tr. v. Walton

Case Details

Full title:PACIFIC PREMIER TRUST, FBO CAROL PATTERSON, CURTIS ROTH IRA ACT…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jan 30, 2023

Citations

3:23-cv-00089-WHO (N.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2023)