Opinion
Case No. C 11-01592 (SI)
10-24-2011
FRANK PABST, an individual, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. GENESCO, INC., a Tennessee corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants.
STIPULATED [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION
TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED
[Civ. L.R. 3-12, 7-11]
Judge: Hon. Susan Illston
On October 18, 2011, plaintiff Frank Pabst ("Plaintiff" or "Pabst") and defendant Genesco, Inc. ("Genesco," and jointly with Plaintiff, "the Parties") filed a stipulated administrative motion to consider whether the following cases should be related pursuant to Civil Local Rules 3-12 and 7-11:
1. Pabst v. Genesco, Inc., U.S. District Court in and for the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division, Case No. C 11-01592 (SI) (the "Pabst Action"); and
2. Fraser v. Genesco, Inc., U.S. District Court in and for the Northern District of California, Oakland Division, Case No. C 11-04881 (LB) (the "Fraser Action," and collectively with the Pabst Action, the "Actions").
Having considered the papers submitted in support of the Parties' motion, the Court, for good cause shown, hereby GRANTS the motion.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Fraser Action is related to the Pabst Action and is re-assigned to this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
By SUSAN ILLSTON
U.S. District Court Judge