The language "at the close of all the evidence," which the Delaware Supreme Court based the Porter decision upon, survived the changes in Superior Court Rule 50 that redesignated directed verdicts as judgments as a matter of law. See also Pabon v. Geico Corp., 2017 WL 3635569, at *1-2 (Del. Super. Aug. 23, 2017) (denying the plaintiffs' motion for judgment as a matter of law where they made the motion at the close of their case, but failed to renew it at the close of all the evidence); Samson v. Somerville, 2005 WL 1953054, at *1 (Del. Super. July 26, 2005) (finding the plaintiff's motion for judgment as a matter of law to be precluded by Rule 50(b) because the plaintiff failed to so move at the close of all the evidence).