From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pabon v. 940 S. Blvd., LLC

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Mar 26, 2020
181 A.D.3d 547 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

11314 Index 301794/13

03-26-2020

Rafael PABON, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. 940 SOUTHERN BLVD., LLC, et al., Defendants–Appellants, Knickerbocker Management, LLC, et al., Defendants.

Hannum Feretic Prendergast & Merlino, LLC, New York (Steven R. Dyki of counsel), for appellants. Silbowitz Garafola Silbowitz Schatz & Frederick, LLP, New York (Jill B. Savedoff of counsel), for respondent.


Hannum Feretic Prendergast & Merlino, LLC, New York (Steven R. Dyki of counsel), for appellants.

Silbowitz Garafola Silbowitz Schatz & Frederick, LLP, New York (Jill B. Savedoff of counsel), for respondent.

Friedman, J.P., Manzanet–Daniels, Gesmer, Gonza´lez, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Julia I. Rodriguez, J.), entered on or about November 14, 2018, which granted plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability on his negligence claim as against defendants 940 Southern Blvd., LLC and FT Meat Corporation, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion denied.

Partial summary judgment on the issue of liability was improperly granted in this action where plaintiff alleges that he was injured when he tripped and fell on the sidewalk abutting property owned by 940 Southern Blvd., LLC and operated as a supermarket by defendant FT Meat Corporation. Plaintiff's account of his accident was uncorroborated by any witnesses, reports to others, or his medical files, and he did not seek treatment for his injury to his wrist until several weeks after his fall. Since the manner in which plaintiff's alleged accident occurred is within his exclusive knowledge, and the only evidence submitted in support of defendants' liability is plaintiff's account, defendants should have the opportunity to subject plaintiff's testimony to cross-examination to have his credibility determined by a trier of fact (see Grant v. Steve Mark, Inc., 96 A.D.3d 614, 947 N.Y.S.2d 97 [1st Dept. 2012] ; Jones v. West 56th St. Assoc., 33 A.D.3d 551, 825 N.Y.S.2d 182 [1st Dept. 2006] ).


Summaries of

Pabon v. 940 S. Blvd., LLC

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Mar 26, 2020
181 A.D.3d 547 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

Pabon v. 940 S. Blvd., LLC

Case Details

Full title:Rafael Pabon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. 940 Southern Blvd., LLC, et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 26, 2020

Citations

181 A.D.3d 547 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 2117
119 N.Y.S.3d 744

Citing Cases

Prendergast v. The N.Y.C. Transit Auth.

In opposition, defendants did not offer any nonnegligent explanation for the accident (seeAcevedo v. CKF…

Pilapanta v. Hudson 888 Owner LLC

Moreover, "[s]ince the manner in which plaintiffs alleged accident occurred is within his exclusive…