From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pablo v. Servicemaster Global Holdings, Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. California
Oct 24, 2011
No. C 08-03894 SI (N.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 08-03894 SI.

October 24, 2011


ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO AUGMENT EXPERT WITNESS LIST, AND JURY INSTRUCTION DISPUTE


On October 24, 2011, during trial in the above-captioned matter, two issues arose for immediate resolution. The first is whether plaintiffs will be allowed to augment their expert witness list in light of their unanticipated difficulty contacting their damages expert Dr. Paul Wazzan. The second issue is the proposed jury instructions concerning whether monthly draws plaintiffs received were salary or commissions.

I. Plaintiffs' Motion to Augment Expert Witness List

II. Dispute over Jury Instruction Regarding Monthly Draws

Agnew v. Cameron 247 Cal. App. 2d 619 in the absence of express stipulation or convincing circumstances indicated a contrary agreement Id.

DRAW ON COMMISSION — SALARY VERSUS COMMISSION
A draw or advance against commission is considered a commission if there is an express or implied promise from the employee to repay the advance.
A draw or advance against commission is considered a salary if there is no express or implied promise from the employee to repay the advance.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pablo v. Servicemaster Global Holdings, Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. California
Oct 24, 2011
No. C 08-03894 SI (N.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2011)
Case details for

Pablo v. Servicemaster Global Holdings, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RUBEN PABLO, BONNIE COURSEY, and JOHN BAHR, Plaintiffs, v. SERVICEMASTER…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Oct 24, 2011

Citations

No. C 08-03894 SI (N.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2011)