From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paakaula v. Potter

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 16, 2008
273 F. App'x 696 (9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 06-16217.

Argued and Submitted March 12, 2008.

Filed April 16, 2008.

Clayton C. Ikei, Esq., Law Office of Clayton C. Ikei, a Law Corporation, Honolulu, HI, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

R. Michael Burke, Esq., Rachel S. Moriyama, AUSA, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Honolulu, HI, for Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii, Samuel P. King, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-04-00071-SPK/LEK.

Before: HUG, RYMER, RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Lori L. Paakaula, an employee of the United States Postal Service, appeals the judgment entered on her failure-to-accommodate claim in favor of the Postmaster General under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973(RHA), 29 U.S.C. § 794(a). We affirm.

Paakaula's claimed disability, post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), is a disease proximately caused by her employment, and thus is an "injury" for purposes of the Federal Employees Compensation Act (FECA). 5 U.S.C. § 8101(5). She pursued a FECA claim for this injury, and received benefits and a position accommodating her injury. Remedies provided under FECA are exclusive of all other remedies against the United States for jobrelated injury. 5 U.S.C. § 8116(c); Figueroa v. United States, 7 F.3d 1405, 1407-08 (9th Cir. 1993). As redress for the same injury was available and awarded, this part of Paakaula's RHA claim is preempted. See Nichols v. Frank, 42 F.3d 503, 514-15 (9th Cir. 1994) (holding that a claim for work-related injury within the Act's definition is preempted but harm from discrimination that was not an injury within the meaning of FECA is not).

Paakaula's retaliation-based claim was dismissed on the merits, and is not on appeal.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Paakaula v. Potter

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 16, 2008
273 F. App'x 696 (9th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Paakaula v. Potter

Case Details

Full title:Lori L. PAAKAULA, Plaintiff-Appellant v. John E. POTTER, of the United…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Apr 16, 2008

Citations

273 F. App'x 696 (9th Cir. 2008)