From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pa. State Police v. Jet-Set Rest., LLC

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Oct 13, 2017
No. 327 MAL 2017 (Pa. Oct. 13, 2017)

Opinion

No. 327 MAL 2017

10-13-2017

PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, BUREAU OF LIQUOR CONTROL ENFORCEMENT, Petitioner v. JET-SET RESTAURANT, LLC, Respondent


Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Commonwealth Court ORDER PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 13th day of September, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. The issue, restated for clarity is:

Does the definition of "frequenting" set forth in Appeal of Speranza, 206 A.2d 292 (Pa. 1965) still apply to Section 4-493(14) of the Liquor Code, or do the 2003 Amendments to the Code demonstrate the General Assembly's intent that a minor may not be inside a licensed premises even a single time unless one of the exceptions enumerated in Section 4-493(14) applies?
Allowance of appeal is DENIED as to all remaining issues.


Summaries of

Pa. State Police v. Jet-Set Rest., LLC

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Oct 13, 2017
No. 327 MAL 2017 (Pa. Oct. 13, 2017)
Case details for

Pa. State Police v. Jet-Set Rest., LLC

Case Details

Full title:PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, BUREAU OF LIQUOR CONTROL ENFORCEMENT…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

Date published: Oct 13, 2017

Citations

No. 327 MAL 2017 (Pa. Oct. 13, 2017)