From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pennsylvania Industrial Energy Coalition v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Feb 13, 1996
543 Pa. 307 (Pa. 1996)

Summary

holding that "[w]ithout timely, express grant of reconsideration, the [Public Utility Commission] lacked authority to issue the . . . order and we [were] without jurisdiction to review it"

Summary of this case from Marth v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of Review

Opinion

Argued January 25, 1996.

Decided February 13, 1996.

Appeal No. 75 M.D. Appeal Dkt. 1995, from Order of Commonwealth Court entered January 9, 1995, at No. 3104 C.D. 1993 and No. 904 C.D. 1994, 653 A.2d 1336 (1995), Affirming in Part and Reversing in Part Order of Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission entered December 13, 1993, at No. 1-900005 and Remanding Case and Vacating Order of Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission entered April 8, 1994, at No. 1-900005; Doris A. Smith, Judge.

Kevin J. Moody, for Public Utility Com'n.

Alan J. Barak, Harrisburg, for The Environmentalists, Intervenor.

David M. Kleppinger, Harrisburg, Derrick P. Williamson, Harrisburg, for P.I.E. Coalition.

Jeffrey A. Franklin, Reading, for MET-ED, Intervenor.

Lauren S. McAndrews, Pittsburgh, for Allegheny Ludlum Corp., Intervenor.

Tanya J. McCloskey, Harrisburg, for Office of Consumer Advocate, Intervenor.

Dann Regan, Harrisburg, for PGA — Intervenor.

Andre C. Dasent, Philadelphia, for Citizens Action Coalition, Intervenor.

Ward L. Smith, Philadelphia, for PECO, Intervenor.

John L. Munsch, Greensburg, for West Power, Intervenor.

Stephen L. Feld, New Castle, for PA Power, Intervenor.

Before NIX, C.J., and FLAHERTY, ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE and NIGRO, JJ.


ORDER


Based on its opinion, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is affirmed.

NEWMAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.


Summaries of

Pennsylvania Industrial Energy Coalition v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Feb 13, 1996
543 Pa. 307 (Pa. 1996)

holding that "[w]ithout timely, express grant of reconsideration, the [Public Utility Commission] lacked authority to issue the . . . order and we [were] without jurisdiction to review it"

Summary of this case from Marth v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of Review

holding that a declaratory order issued under Section 331 (f) of Public Utility Code, 66 P. S. § 331 (f), to conclude an investigation initiated by the PUC is a final and appealable adjudication

Summary of this case from PARKESBURG BOROUGH v. PA UTILITY COM'N

affirming based on this Court's opinion

Summary of this case from Roland Stock, LLC v. Hous. Auth. of the Cnty. of Berks
Case details for

Pennsylvania Industrial Energy Coalition v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Case Details

Full title:PENNSYLVANIA INDUSTRIAL ENERGY COALITION v. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 13, 1996

Citations

543 Pa. 307 (Pa. 1996)
670 A.2d 1152

Citing Cases

Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Unless the commission otherwise orders, no public utility shall make any change in any existing and duly…

In re Order Amending Rule 102 of Pa. Rules of Appellate Procedure

The power to clarify or correct does not extend to substantive modifications. SeePa. Indus. Energy Coalition…