Opinion
8:19-cv-00523 DOC (JDEx)
02-12-2024
P&P IMPORTS LLC, a California limited liability company; Plaintiff, v. JOHNSON ENTERPRISES, LLC, a Virginia limited liability company DBA TAILGATING PROS; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendants.
JUDGMENT
THE HON. DAVID O. CARTER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
This action was tried to a jury beginning on January 30, 2024 in Courtroom 10A of the above-entitled Court, before the Honorable District Court Judge David O. Carter. On February 1, 2024, the jury returned a verdict in favor of Plaintiff P&P Imports LLC (“P&P) and against Defendant Johnson Enterprises, LLC (“Johnson Enterprises”) on all questions. (Dkt. 212.)
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED IN THIS MATTER IN FAVOR OF P&P AND AGAINST JOHNSON ENTERPRISES AS FOLLOWS:
1. P&P's four in a row game has developed secondary meaning.
2. Johnson Enterprises has intentionally infringed the trade dress of P&P's four in a row game, knowing it was infringement.
3. P&P shall recover $51,526.06 from Johnson Enterprises on the jury verdict.
4. As provided in 28 U.S.C. § 1961, P&P shall also recover post-judgment interest, running from the date of this Judgment until the Judgment is paid, on all amounts listed in paragraph 3 above, at a rate equal to the weekly average one-year constant maturity Treasury yield as of the week preceding the date of this Judgment, compounded annually.