From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ozsusamlar v. Adams

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 18, 2021
No. 21-6190 (4th Cir. Oct. 18, 2021)

Opinion

21-6190

10-18-2021

MUSTAFA OZSUSAMLAR, Petitioner - Appellant, v. P. ADAMS, Warden, Respondent - Appellee.

Mustafa Ozsusamlar, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: October 14, 2021

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. John Preston Bailey, District Judge. (5:20-cv-00099-JPB-JPM)

Mustafa Ozsusamlar, Appellant Pro Se.

Before DIAZ and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM

Mustafa Ozsusamlar appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Ozsusamlar's informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, he has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) ("The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief."). Accordingly, we deny Ozsusamlar's motion to appoint counsel and affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Ozsusamlar v. Adams

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 18, 2021
No. 21-6190 (4th Cir. Oct. 18, 2021)
Case details for

Ozsusamlar v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:MUSTAFA OZSUSAMLAR, Petitioner - Appellant, v. P. ADAMS, Warden…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Oct 18, 2021

Citations

No. 21-6190 (4th Cir. Oct. 18, 2021)