From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

OZOROSKI v. MAUE

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 9, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08-CV-0082 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 9, 2010)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08-CV-0082.

March 9, 2010


ORDER


AND NOW, this 9th day of March, 2010, upon consideration of the motion (Doc. 139) to strike, filed by defendants Prison Health Services and Adam A. Edelman, M.D. (collectively, "defendants"), wherein defendants move to strike plaintiff's sur-reply (Doc. 136) to defendants' motion for summary judgment because it was filed without permission of the court, and it appearing that plaintiff failed to comply with Local Rule 7.7 prior to filing his sur-reply, see L.R. 7.7 (prohibiting parties from filing sur-reply briefs without court permission), but that no prejudice has resulted from plaintiff's procedural impropriety, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Defendants' motion (Doc. 139) to strike is DENIED.
2. No further summary judgment briefing shall be permitted absent receipt of court approval pursuant to Local Rule 7.7.


Summaries of

OZOROSKI v. MAUE

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 9, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08-CV-0082 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 9, 2010)
Case details for

OZOROSKI v. MAUE

Case Details

Full title:STANLEY N. OZOROSKI, Plaintiff v. DR. FREDERICK R. MAUE, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 9, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08-CV-0082 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 9, 2010)