From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ozoroski v. Beard

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 3, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08-CV-0082 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 3, 2008)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08-CV-0082.

March 3, 2008


ORDER


AND NOW, this 3rd day of March, 2008, upon consideration of the motion to dismiss the original complaint (Doc. 5), and it appearing that plaintiff has filed an amended complaint (Doc. 7), and that an amended complaint renders the original complaint a legal nullity, see Snyder v. Pascack Valley Hosp., 303 F.3d 271, 276 (3d Cir. 2002) ("An amended complaint supercedes the original version in providing the blueprint for the future course of the lawsuit."); 6 CHARLES ALAN WRIGHT ET AL., FEDERAL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE § 1476 (2d ed. 1990) ("Once an amended pleading is interposed, the original pleading no longer performs any function in the case. . . ."), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion to dismiss the original complaint (Doc. 5) is DENIED as moot.


Summaries of

Ozoroski v. Beard

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 3, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08-CV-0082 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 3, 2008)
Case details for

Ozoroski v. Beard

Case Details

Full title:STANLEY N. OZOROSKI, Plaintiff v. JEFFERY A. BEARD, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 3, 2008

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08-CV-0082 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 3, 2008)