From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ozimek v. Rodgers

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Jul 20, 2016
499 Mich. 978 (Mich. 2016)

Opinion

Docket No. 153836. COA No. 331726.

07-20-2016

Vanessa OZIMEK, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Lee J. RODGERS, Defendant–Appellee.


Order

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the March 8, 2016 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the order of the Court of Appeals and we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for further consideration. On remand, we DIRECT the Court of Appeals to issue an opinion specifically addressing the issue whether the order in question may affect the custody of a minor within the meaning of MCR 7.202(6)(a)(iii), or otherwise be appealable by right under MCR 7.203(A). If the Court of Appeals determines that the Wayne Circuit Court Family Division's order is appealable by right, it shall take jurisdiction over the plaintiff-appellant's claim of appeal and address its merits. If the Court of Appeals determines that the Wayne Circuit Court Family Division's order is not appealable by right, it may then dismiss the plaintiff-appellant's claim of appeal for lack of jurisdiction, or exercise its discretion to treat the claim of appeal as an application for leave to appeal and grant the application. See Varran v. Granneman (On Remand), 312 Mich.App. 591, 880 N.W.2d 242 (2015), and Wardell v. Hincka, 297 Mich.App. 127, 133 n. 1, 822 N.W.2d 278 (2012).

We do not retain jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Ozimek v. Rodgers

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Jul 20, 2016
499 Mich. 978 (Mich. 2016)
Case details for

Ozimek v. Rodgers

Case Details

Full title:Vanessa OZIMEK, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Lee J. RODGERS, Defendant–Appellee.

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Jul 20, 2016

Citations

499 Mich. 978 (Mich. 2016)
881 N.W.2d 472

Citing Cases

Ozimek v. Rodgers

The Supreme Court has directed us " to issue an opinion specifically addressing the issue whether the order…

Ozimek v. Rodgers

The Supreme Court has directed us " to issue an opinion specifically addressing the issue whether the order…