From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ozier v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
Nov 16, 1999
7 S.W.3d 19 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. ED 75681.

November 16, 1999.

APPEAL FROM CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY; MICHAEL P. DAVID, JUDGE.

Raymund J. Capelovitch, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J. and PUDLOWSKI, S.J. and HOFF J.


ORDER


Kareem R. Ozier (Movant) appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant contends his appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to file an application for transfer to the Missouri Supreme Court.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. The motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no jurisprudential value. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Ozier v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
Nov 16, 1999
7 S.W.3d 19 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Ozier v. State

Case Details

Full title:KAREEM R. OZIER, MOVANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four

Date published: Nov 16, 1999

Citations

7 S.W.3d 19 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)