From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oyarzo v. Tuolumne Fire Dist.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 11, 2011
1:11-cv-01271-LJO-DLB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2011)

Opinion

1:11-cv-01271-LJO-DLB

10-11-2011

BENJAMIN C. OYARZO, NICHOLAS HART, Plaintiffs, v. TUOLUMNE FIRE DISTRICT (A.K.A. "TUOLUMNE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT"), JOSEPH TURNER, in his individual and official capacities, KENNETH HOCKETT, in his individual and official capacities, BRIAN MACHADO, in his individual and official capacities, DARLENE HUTCHINS, in her individual and official capacities, TONEY POWERS, in his individual and official capacities, and DOES 1 THROUGH 20, Inclusive, Defendants.

SEIBERT & BAUTISTA SHANNON SEIBERT (State Bar No. 240317) JOE BAUTISTA (State Bar No. 255708) NINA MONTOYA (State Bar No. 237419) 18711 Tiffeni Drive #17-129 Twain Harte, California 95383 Attorneys for Plaintiffs MAYALL HURLEY, PC. J. ANTHONY ABBOTT (State Bar No. 83975) Attorneys for Defendants SEIBERT & BAUTISTA BY: Shannon Seibert Attorneys for Plaintiff MAYALL HURLEY BY: J. Anthony Abbott Attorneys for Defendants


SEIBERT & BAUTISTA

SHANNON SEIBERT (State Bar No. 240317)

JOE BAUTISTA (State Bar No. 255708)

NINA MONTOYA (State Bar No. 237419)

18711 Tiffeni Drive #17-129

Twain Harte, California 95383

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

MAYALL HURLEY, PC.

J. ANTHONY ABBOTT (State Bar No. 83975)

Attorneys for Defendants

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER; ORDER

Judge: Hon. Lawrence J. O'Neill

IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND STIPULATED between Benjamin Oyarzo and Nicholas Hart, by and through their attorney Shannon M. Seibert of SEIBERT & BAUTISTA, and Tuolumne Fire District, Joseph Turner, Kenneth Hockett, Brian Machado, Darlene Hutchins, and Toney Powers, by and through their attorney, J. Anthony Abbott of MAYALL HURLEY, that the time for defendant to answer the amended complaint will be extended two weeks to allow defendants to speak with the members of the Tuolumne Dire District Board of Directors and obtain sufficient information to be able to answer the amended complaint. The parties agree to this extension with the understanding that the extension is provided only for the filing of a responsive pleading in the form of an answer. The answer will be served and filed with the Court no later than October 25, 2011.

The parties request that the Court enter an order approving this Stipulation.

SEIBERT & BAUTISTA

BY: Shannon Seibert

Attorneys for Plaintiff

MAYALL HURLEY

BY: J. Anthony Abbott

Attorneys for Defendants

ORDER

Defendants' answer shall be filed with the Court no later than October 25, 2011. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dennis L. Beck

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Oyarzo v. Tuolumne Fire Dist.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 11, 2011
1:11-cv-01271-LJO-DLB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2011)
Case details for

Oyarzo v. Tuolumne Fire Dist.

Case Details

Full title:BENJAMIN C. OYARZO, NICHOLAS HART, Plaintiffs, v. TUOLUMNE FIRE DISTRICT…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 11, 2011

Citations

1:11-cv-01271-LJO-DLB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2011)