Opinion
2016-2149
03-13-2017
EVIDEO OWNERS, MAURO DIDOMENICO, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL THOSE SIMILARLY SITUATED, DOUGLAS BUERGER, CRAIG LINDEN, REALVIRT LLC, PAUL BAROUS, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee
PATRICK RICHARD DELANEY, Ditthavong & Steiner, P.C., Alexandria, VA, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. NICOLAS RILEY, Appellate Staff, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by MARK R. FREEMAN, BENJAMIN C. MIZER; NATHAN KELLEY, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:15-cv-00413-LKG, Judge Lydia Kay Griggsby. PATRICK RICHARD DELANEY, Ditthavong & Steiner, P.C., Alexandria, VA, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. NICOLAS RILEY, Appellate Staff, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by MARK R. FREEMAN, BENJAMIN C. MIZER; NATHAN KELLEY, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA. Before MOORE, O'MALLEY, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.
For the reasons articulated in the decision by the United States Court of Federal Claims, we affirm. We order Appellants to show cause within fifteen days why sanctions should not be imposed for a frivolous appeal pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.
AFFIRMED
COSTS
Costs to Appellee.