Owens v. State

3 Citing cases

  1. Shaw v. State

    139 So. 3d 79 (Miss. Ct. App. 2014)   Cited 5 times

    See Foster v. State, 639 So.2d 1263, 1289 (Miss.1994) (“A defendant who fails to make a contemporaneous objection must rely on plain error to raise the assignment on appeal.”). See Owens v. State, 763 So.2d 917, 920 (¶ 9) (Miss.Ct.App.2000). ¶ 61.

  2. Shaw v. State

    NO. 2011-KA-01536-COA (Miss. Ct. App. Oct. 8, 2013)

    See Manuel v. State, 667 So. 2d 590, 592, 93 (Miss. 1995); See also Miss. Code Ann. § 99-17-19 (judge in a criminal case shall instruct the jury upon the principles of law applicable to the case). See Owens v. State, 763 So. 2d 917, 920 (¶9) (Miss. Ct. App. 2000). In Jenkins v. State, 913 So. 2d 1044, 1048-49 (¶¶12-13) (Miss.

  3. Berry v. State

    2003 KA 1181 (Miss. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 5 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Each of those motions challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, and is therefore reviewed when the last challenge was made. Myles v. State, 774 So.2d 486 (¶¶ 15, 16) (Miss.Ct.App. 2000), Owens v. State, 763 So.2d 917 (¶ 7) (Miss.Ct.App. 2000). In this case that would be the motion for JNOV. When this Court reviews the denial of a motion for JNOV, it considers the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, and accords to it all reasonable inferences which may be drawn from the evidence.